Participant Role in Semantics
Introduction
S NP + VP
A human would like express his or her idea or thought through sentences
to give information to the other. A sentence is a string of words that contains
certain information. The information which is presented by the different
sentences, in parts of sentences, is called proposition. Proposition is the
referring expression which is abstract but meaningful.
In semantic analysis, every proposition contains one predicate and a
number of expressions called arguments. The use of predicate is to make the
specific relation with the arguments. Here, predicate is a verb, an adjective,
a preposition, or a noun phrase. While argument is a role that is referring to
the person, things, etc.
Kreidler (1998: 68) states, the arguments that accompany the predicate have
different semantic functions, or roles, in the proposition. The semantic
function which is the role of arguments depends on the predicate in producing
meaning.
The semantic roles have the same name with semantic cases, thematic
cases, thematic roles, participant roles, or thematic functions by other
linguists (ibid, 82). Although they
have the same meaning and function, this paper would like to define participant
roles as the role that is conducted by the person or the thing to describe the
referring expression in particular situation.
This paper is started from the definition and illustration of participant
role and the position of referring expression. Then, the theory will be applied
by analyzing the article of ‘People Education’ taken from in the Star Golf.
Participant Role
Fillmore (1968: 19) as the pioneer
of participant role in ‘The Case For Case’ state that the term ‘case’ for the
kind of remote syntactic-semantic relations that are at issue. In this case,
syntactic is as grammatical notion has a place in the element of the grammar of
every language then identify it into meaning. Therefore in the universality of
the theory, Fillmore says:
“The case notions
comprise a set of universal, presumably innate, concepts which identify certain
types of judgments human beings are capable of making about the events that are
going on around them, judgments about such matters as who did it, who it
happened to, and what got changed” (ibid,
24).
The cases that are
classified by Fillmore are as follows:
Agentive (A), the case of typically animate perceived
instigator of the action identified by the verb.
Instrumental (I), the case of inanimate force or
object causally involved in the action or state identified by the verb.
Dative (D), the case of the animate being affected by
the state or action identified by the verb.
Factitive (F), the case of the object or being
resulting from the action or state identified by the verb, or understood as a
part of the meaning of the verb.
Locative (L), the case which identifies the location
or spatial orientation of the state or action identified by the verb.
Objective (O), the semantically most neutral case,
the case of anything representable by a noun whose role in the action or state
identified by the verb is identified by the semantic interpretation of the verb
itself.; conceivably the concept should be limited to things which are affected
by the action or state identified by the verb. The term is not to be confused
with the notion of direct object, nor with the name of the surface case
synonymous with accusative.
Case grammar
focused on the description of participant role that is played by an argument in
the formed of referring expression. In other words, argument determines
participants roles.
Participant role can be defined as a
role or position that is associated with argument, or the roles that argument
has.
Soekemi (2000: 113) divides the
roles played by the participant object and people into:
- Agent, the person carrying out the action described.
- Affected, the thing or the person, upon which the action is carried out.
- Instrument, the thing by means of which the action is carried out
- Beneficiary, the person for whose benefit the action.
- Location, the place where the action described.
While, Fromkin, Rodman, and Hyams (2003) classify the thematic roles
into:
- Agent, the one who performs an action.
For example: Joyce
ran.
- Theme, the one or thing that undergoes an action.
For example: Mary found the puppy.
- Location, the place where an action happens.
For example: It rains in Surabaya.
- Goal, The place to which an action originates
For example: He flew from Singapore to Surabaya.
- Instrument, the means by which an action is performed.
For example: Freddie cuts hair with
a razor.
- Experiencer, one who perceives something.
For example: Idham
heard Betty playing the guitar.
- Causative, a natural force that causes a change.
For example: The
wind damaged the roof.
- Possessor, one who has something.
For example: The tail of the dog wagged furiously.
(pp. 193-194)
From those different classifications, it can be drawn the participant
roles as follows:
- Agent, can be called the doer, that is the person who performs an action.
For example: Freddie
ran. ‘Freddie’ is an agent.
- Affected, can be called as theme, that is the person or the thing is affected by the state or action identified by the verb.
For example: Marry found the puppy.
‘The Puppy’ is the role of affected in the sentence.
- Instrument, is the thing by means of which the action is carried out. Instrument is indicated by “with”.
For example: The gardener opened the gate with the key. ‘The key’ is the role of instrument in the sentence.
- Beneficiary, is the person whose benefit the action. It is indicated by “for”.
For example: The gardener opened the gate for the students in the campus. ‘The students’ is a role of beneficiary
in the sentence.
e.
Location, can be identified by the goal as referring to
the place. Location can be identified by “at”, “in”, “from”, etc. For example:
The gardener opened the gate for the students in the campus. ‘In the campus’ is a role of location in the
sentence.
f.
Possessor, one who has something.
For example: The tail of the dog wagged furiously.
The important rule of participant
roles
Base
on the case grammar by Fillmore, the rules is established to make apriority
according to the subject in a proposition. He says, “if there is an A, it
becomes the subject, otherwise if there is an I, it becomes the subject;
otherwise, the subject is the O” (Fillmore, 1968: 33).
Fillmore (1968: 32) also
identifies the rules of preposition to indicate the role as follows:
“The
A preposition is by; the I
preposition is by if there is no A,
otherwise it is with; the O and F
prepositions are typically zero; the
B preposition is for; the D
preposition is typically to; the L
and T (for time) prepositions are either semantically nonempty (in which case
they are introduced as optional choices from the lexicon), or they are selected
by the particular associated noun [on the
street, at the corner (=intersection of twos streets), in the corner (of a room); on
Monday, at noon, in the afternoon].”
2.2. The position of referring expression
According to Soekemi (2000: 114) there are
three different grammatical position of referring expression in sentences.
a.
Subject position: preceding a main verb
b.
Object position: immediately following a main verb
c.
Complement position: after a verb, but not immediately,
often after a preposition.
For
example: The gardener opened the gate with
the key
S V
O Prep. Complement
The following table is used to
make it easier to understand about the position role and grammatical position.
Table 1: The position role
and grammatical position
Subject
|
Object
|
Complement
|
|
Agent
|
The gardener
|
||
Affected
|
The gate
|
||
Instrument
|
With the key
|
Deep Structure and Semantic
Representation
The structure of semantic theory
is used to correlate the form units in the sentence. It is the study of the
sense relations between words that is embedded into structure as a system of
interrelated elements. In the transformational grammar, there are two levels in
the syntactic structure, namely deep structure and surface structure. As Lyon (1995: 211) defines about deep structure, is more
intimately connected with sentence-meaning than surface structure, which is
more intimately connected with the way sentence is pronounced. Sentence-meaning
in deep structure is held to include participant role. In this case, using deep
structure is necessary for interpreting the sentence. For example:
a. ‘Diana is easy to please.’ This
sentence means that ‘it is easy for someone to please Diana’. This sentence
also has the same meaning with ‘someone pleases Diana’. ‘Diana’ here is
receiver.
b. ‘Diana is eager to please.’ This
sentence has the same meaning with ‘Diana pleases someone’. ‘Diana’ here is the
doer.
![](file:///C:/Users/Diana/AppData/Local/Temp/msohtmlclip1/01/clip_image001.gif)
The
structure above is used to make diagram tree. It is necessarily used to get the
point in classifying participant role.
For
example: The baby slept.
S S= Sentence
NP VP NP= Noun Phrase
D N
V VP=Verb Phrase
The baby
slept D=
Determiner
NP D+N VP V + NP
N V
+ PP
D
+ Adj. + N V + NP + PP
Pronoun V + Adj
V
Analysis and Discussion
Analysis
By analyzing the data which is
taken from the Star Golf, is expected
more understand about the participant role in semantics.
1. Cardio-thoratic
surgeon Datuk Dr Zainuddin Wazir
decided to venture beyond the operating
theatre and became an
agriculturalist.
‘Cardio-thoratic surgeon Datuk Dr Zainuddin Wazir’ has a
role of an agent with the position as the subject that preceding a main verb.
Meanwhile, ‘the operating theatre’ and ‘agriculturalist’ are roles of a theme
that undergoes an action with the position as the object in the sentence.
2.
For years, he single-mindedly
pursued a career as a heart speacialist.
‘For years’ is a role of time in the
sentence. ‘He’ is as an agent has grammatical position as the subject in the
sentence. ‘A career’ has a role as a theme in the sentence with a grammatical
position of object in the sentence. Likewise, ‘for years’ is as a time in
participant role and as complement in grammatical position.
3.
In recognition of his abilities, he
was transferred from the Kuala Lumpur General Hospital
(GH) to Penang GH to set up the heart
centre there in 1994.
‘He’ in the sentence has the position
role as affected because ‘he’ here is the person -Datuk Dr Zainuddin Wazir, is
affected by the state or action identified by the verb that is ‘transferred’. The
grammatical position of ‘he’ is as a subject in the passive voice. ‘From the
Kuala Lumpur General Hospital (HG)’ is indicated as location in participant
role because it is indicated by ‘from’ that referring to the place.
4. The entrepreneurial spirit in him set him on
the path to yet another challenge – the time he partially traded his
surgical gloves for a straw hat.
‘He’
is an agent in the sentence. The grammatical position of ‘he’ in the sentence
is as the subject that is preceding the main verb of ’traded’. ‘His surgical
gloves’ is indicated as theme in a participant role. ‘His surgical gloves’ is
also indicated as the object in grammatical position because it immediately
following a main verb of ‘traded’.
5.
He decided to grow bananas on a commercial scale..
‘He’
is an agent in a participant role, has the function as a subject in the
sentence. And ‘bananas’ is an
affected that the action is carried out. ‘Bananas’ here has position
grammatical of an object in the sentence.
6.
Many of my Medan clients were involved in the agriculture business….
‘Many
of my Medan
clients’ is indicated as affected in the participant role because this thing is
affected by the state identified by the verb ‘were involved’. Then, ‘in the
agriculture business’ is as a location in participant role that is indicated by
‘in’.
7.
…I became interested and did a lot of research on my own, talking to
experts and looking at the various crops that could be
cultivated…
‘I’
is the role of affected in the sentence. In this case, ‘I’ is indicated as subject
in grammatical position of passive voice. ‘A lot of research’ is also the role
of affected in the sentence which is the thing that is affected by the action
identified by the verb ‘did’. Therefore, ‘a lot of research has the grammatical
position as an object. Then, ‘experts’ and ‘the various crops’ are also the
roles of affected which is a person or a thing that is affected by the state or
action identified by the verbs ‘talking to and ‘looking at’.
8.
“Finally, based on advice given by Fama (Federal Agricultural Marketing
Authority), we chose to focus on bananas although we also grow pineapples,
papayas and jackfruit..
‘Advice’
is a role of affected, that is a thing that is affected by the state or action
identified by the verb ‘given’. ‘Fama’ is an agent who is the doer of an action
in the sentence. ‘We’ is the role of an agent or the doer does an action. While, ‘bananas’ is an affected which has the
grammatical function as an object. ‘We’ in the second clause is also an agent
in the sentence which is as the doer does an action. ‘Pineapples, papayas, and
jackfruit’ is an object in grammatical position with a role of affected in the
sentence.
9.
Once banana was decided as the main
crop, Dr Zainuddin, who is Synergy
Farm (M) Sdn Bhd executive chairman, visited China
to see how it was grown there.
‘Banana’
is an affected in the sentence. It is the thing that is affected by the state
or action identified by the verb. In this case, ‘banana’ becomes a subject in
grammatical position in the passive voice. Then, Dr Zainuddin in the sentence
has the role of an agent. It means that Dr Zainuddin is the doer which performs
an action. Dr Zainuddin has grammatical position as a subject in the sentence.
‘China’
is a role of location in the sentence that grammatical position as an object in
the sentence because it is immediately following a main verb.
10.
We worked on the master plan for two
years, looking at the business plan,
market potential and the technology needed.
‘We’ is a role of an agent in the
sentence. ‘We’ is the doer performs an action in the sentence. Therefore, ‘we’
has a grammatical function of subject in the sentence. ‘On the master plan’ is
a role of location which is indicated by ‘on’ in the sentence. In this case,
‘on the master plan’ is an instrument in the grammatical position. And also,
‘for two years’ has a grammatical position of complement in the sentence which
has a role of time. Then, ‘the business plan, market potential, and the
technology needed’ is a role of an affected in the sentence which has the
function as an object in grammatical position.
3.2.
Discussion
In the discussion, the table will be
drawn to get the summary from the analysis.
1.
Cardio-thoratic
surgeon Datuk Dr Zainuddin Wazir
decided to venture beyond the operating
theatre and became an
agriculturalist.
Subject
|
Object
|
Complement
|
|
Agent
|
Cardio-thoratic surgeon Datuk Dr Zainuddin Wazir
|
||
Theme
|
The operating theatre
|
||
An
agriculturalist
|
2.
For years, he single-mindedly
pursued a career as a heart speacialist.
Subject
|
Object
|
Complement
|
|
Time
|
For years
|
||
Agent
|
He
|
||
Theme
|
A career
|
3.
In recognition of his abilities, he
was transferred from the Kuala Lumpur General Hospital
(GH) to Penang GH to set up the heart
centre there in 1994.
Subject
|
Object
|
Complement
|
|
Affected
|
He
|
||
Location
|
From
the Kuala Lumpur General
Hospital (GH)
|
4. The entrepreneurial spirit in him set him on
the path to yet another challenge – the time he partially traded his
surgical gloves for a straw hat.
Subject
|
Object
|
Complement
|
|
Agent
|
He
|
||
Theme
|
His surgical gloves
|
5. He
decided to grow bananas on a commercial scale..
Subject
|
Object
|
Complement
|
|
Agent
|
He
|
||
Affected
|
Bananas
|
||
Location
|
On
a commercial scale
|
6.
Many of my Medan clients were involved in the agriculture business….
Subject
|
Object
|
Complement
|
|
Affected
|
Many of my medan
clients
|
||
Location
|
in the agriculture business
|
7.
…I became interested and did a lot of research on my own, talking to
experts and looking at the various crops that could be cultivated…
Subject
|
Object
|
Complement
|
|
Affected
|
I
|
||
Location
|
A lot of research
|
||
Experts
|
|||
The various crops
|
8.
“Finally, based on advice given by Fama (Federal Agricultural Marketing
Authority), we chose to focus on bananas although we also grow pineapples,
papayas and jackfruit..
Subject
|
Object
|
Complement
|
|
Affected
|
Advice
|
||
bananas
|
|||
Pineapples, papayas and jackfruit
|
|||
Agent
|
Fama
|
||
We
|
|||
We
|
9.
Once banana was decided as the main
crop, Dr Zainuddin, who is Synergy
Farm (M) Sdn Bhd executive chairman, visited China
to see how it was grown there.
Subject
|
Object
|
Complement
|
|
Affected
|
banana
|
||
Agent
|
Dr Zainuddin
|
||
Location
|
China
|
10.
We worked on the master plan for two
years, looking at the business plan,
market potential and the technology needed.
Subject
|
Object
|
Complement
|
|
Agent
|
We
|
||
Location
|
On the master plan
|
||
Time
|
For two years
|
||
Affected
|
The business plan
|
||
Market potential
|
|||
The technology needed
|
From the table above, the
participant roles and the position of referring expression can be identified
clearly to get more understanding about the semantic roles.
After making the table, the
summary can be drawn that the sentence must have the agent as the subject to
identify the doer who is doing the action in the sentence. Next, an object as
the sufferer immediately following a main verb is often identified by the role
of affected in the sentence. And the last, a complement is used to complete the
sentence more detail. In the complement can be identified by the role of instrument,
the role of location, the role of time and so forth.
Conclusion
The participant role is the role
in the semantics as the position or a role that is associated with arguments.
The participant role is the role that is conducted by the person or the thing
to describe the referring expression in particular situation. The grammatical
positions which consist of subject, object, and complement are identified in
order to get more understanding about the position in the sentence.
The participant role is often
found in the sentence either speaking or writing. By identifying a role in a
sentence and grammatical position, people can detect the sentence more clearly
to get the understanding.
References
Fillmore, Charles J. 1998. “The case for case”, in E. Bach and R.
Harms, eds, Universals in Linguistic
theory (New York:
Holt, Rinehart and Winston), 1-88.
Fromkin,
Victoria, Robert Rodman, Nina
Hyams. 2003. An Introduction to Language.
Seventh Edition. USA.
Kreidler. Charless W. 1998. Introducing English Semantics. London.
Lyons, John. 1995. Linguistic Semantics. Australia: Cambridge University
Press.
Soekemi, Kem. 2000. Semantics A Work Book Second Edition. Surabaya:
UNESA University Press.
Star
Golf, January 14th, 2002.
Komentar